Buy both! The audix vx10? When you're not using the 105 on voice...try it on snare. Sennheiser e 945. I own a Neumann kms105 but wonder about the Shure ksm9 as I originally wanted a live condenser mic that resembled my bassists ksm32. Alright. FR curves are similar (KSM9 has less proximity effect; KMS105 a bit smoother HF bump) and both seem to allow a good singer to sound, well, … Purchased the RPW184 for my current setup and it works great! It really depends on the PA. The KSM9 from Shure Inc. of Niles, IL originally debuted as the microphone part of the high end UR24S/KSM9 wireless system. I've heard from several FOH pals that the KSM9 and KMS104/105 are sonically very much in the same ballpark. Neumann KMS 105 and Shure SM58 Design Moving further, let's see the external of these microphones and starting with Neumann, this one comes in a Velcro pouch that stores the unit and its mounting to handle both threading which is very impressive yet, not surprising for the price point. I like the KMS105, but its good sensitivity can be a problem in this situation. The house sound guy won't necessarily be in a position to take balanced line-level from stage. Subject: trying to decide between a NEUMANN KMS 105 or a SHURE KSM 9 mic. For those with stellar voices performing in controlled environments I would say perhaps the Neumann may be a better choice. Neumann, Shure / By admin. quanah1953 #1; 14 years ago . Comparison of Shure KSM9 and Shure KSM9HS based on specifications, reviews and ratings. I have both...2 x KSM9's (new) and one KSM 105 (used, not working now)...when the 105 was working it was similar to the KSM9, but i liked the shure better (thats why i have 2...replaced the neuman). Try out the audix om7 too, its a great live mic for male voices. There was no convincing him that it was the wrong mic to use, he loved the "sound" of it. Another which I fell in love with when trying it out in a nearby music store is the EV ND767. I play small rooms with a Martin acoustic plugged in and it is way better than the beta 58a I was using. For those comparing the ksm9 to the kms105, I have owned both and the shure is much more suited to my voice and stage demands. Since this is not a serious record effort (mainly a backup CD for the video capture for webcast of the message) it's also run through an AutoCom on the way to the Tascam burner. These mics include Shure SM57 and the new TC Helicon 75 (which I bought to use with my voice live foot pedal). It's much better for band touring - excellent rejection, but great tone and response. Blue Room technical forum: Neumann KMS104 or Shure KSM9? I also have been using it to track vocals and it is real nice for that too. Most mics are not returnable so I would really like to know the answers before I buy. You said you didn't like the 104. It is smooth and full sounding compared to the beta87a and much more forgiving and feedback resistant on loud stages than the Kms105. Of course, but in your situation do you think grabbing a 105 would have been the answer? Yeah, I love these mics on saxophones, especially when they are on goosenecks that the performers move around a lot for solos. Is the SHRPW184 KSM9 replacement cartridge compatible with my current system and does this replacement cartridge offer a selectable polar pattern like the KSM9 Microphone? Rode S1 vs. Neumann KMS 105 ... /11/11 7:58 AM What do you think about Rode S1? To my ear they sound better on instruments than a KM184. Cool! ... is rated at 22dBA which is a little bit on the high side compared to other handheld condensers such as the Rode S1 and Neumann KMS 104 which both check in at 18dBA. The KMS 105's supercardioid pattern and transparent Personal preference, the KSM9 is nice, but overall I like the E9xx mics better. The peaks are usually down -3dB across the DBX. The Shure case is, obviously, better protection but a microphone bag is more likely to be the kind of case used for a touring mic. Wouldn't be my first choice in those situations. Vocal Microphone. For those comparing the ksm9 to the kms105, I have owned both and the shure is much more suited to my voice and stage demands. The 104 is cardioid and the 105 is hypercard. 1.93 in. Good luck! You really need to try them out for yourself. The BGVs are all on SM86s, and the vocal submaster is run through a DBX 166A comp/limiter. Shure KSM9 vs Neumann KMS105. Can I just say, thanks for pitching back in Icarus. Very balanced, lots of detail. Yeah, I should clarify: I tried the kms104 versus some other mics and it was hands down the best, but I didn't get a chance to A/B it vs the 105 or the ksm9. True gearslut solution... Can't decide? Let's get this straight: the Neumann KMS 105 sounds even better! (well, not for drunk....). Sennheiser e 965. Categories; Brands; Versus; EN. Now not so much. The KMS 105 is developed to optimally transmit the human voice making it the first choice for demanding live applications. I now keep the KSM9 with the band gear and take the 105 out on solo acoustic tours. Shure KSM9HS. It is smooth and full sounding compared to the beta87a and much more forgiving and feedback resistant on loud stages than the Kms105. This particular mic, in my opinion, is truly outstanding on stage. Samson CL5 has a golden capsule as well. Shure SM86. They aren't in the same league as these mics. Microphone Shootout, Microphone Comparison, Premium Condenser, Stage Vocal Microphone, AKG C7, Neumann KMS 105, Shure KSM 9, Sire Monster 7 Red Guys, If you do a shootout of these all great mice, please consider also the Heil PR35. These mics include Shure SM57 and the new TC Helicon 75 (which I bought to use with my voice live foot pedal). I feel like I'm screaming myself hoarse everynight just trying to be heard. Thanks! Most stage microphones make use of dynamic capsules, as they don’t require a power source and can thus be used almost anywhere. If I had to choose one i would personally go with the KSM9, especially as you can switch the pattern if you are wanting something more open. I used (and still use) the 105 for years on the road, but about a year ago got the Shure (KSM9HS, I believe) as well. Shure Beta 57 works amazingly well on a Baritone voice. Thank you for the responses guys. I don't like them at all. If so, how do they compare? But for the majority of vocalists like myself who posses better than average vocal skills and perform on loud stages with house PA's of different quality from gig to gig, the Shure is an execellent vocal mic. Due to the low inherent noise, crosstalk behavior that is free of colouration and the supercardioid characteristics, KMS-105 is ideal for a solo singer on stage. The Neumann KMS 105 handheld condenser microphone gives you studio-quality vocals live on stage. I used a KMS 105 recently and I was blown away! I haven't heard the top-of the-line Shure KSM9 yet, however I have used a Shure Beta 87A since they came out and I liked them better than a regular 58. The KMS 105 is a studio grade vocal microphone for stage use. I'm testing a KSM9 obtained from ebay- sounds dark and needs tons of gain... maybe 20db more than an akg 535eb - is this what others have experienced? I've used the Shure Betas. So between the two the KSM9 is probably your best bet. I'd love any reviews from those of you that are familiar with them. Effortless almost, and it sounded great! My bands have LOUD stage volume but mic still great. Especially on the ballads, and Eagles tunes! I use 105 mics for jazz recordings, on instruments and vocals. Allen&Heath GL3800, onboard micamps; a bit of rolloff at 80Hz on the channel. I need a vocal microphone for multitrack recordings of liveband's. I read post claiming it is compatible although Shure does not. But I think either a Sennheiser e965 vs Neumann KMS 105 or 104 (which apparently has a bit more bass proximity) is a GREAT choice. I'm wondering if something is wrong with the mic... YouTube - Bo Bruce - Black Ice (Acoustic), Anthem | Acoustic Pickups and Electronics | LR Baggs. The 5400 has a 1" capsule, rolloff and a pad. I'm not excusing bad mic technique; I'm saying that there are different tools for different jobs. You are already looking at the right range of vocal microphones if you are looking for highest quality on your vocal: I would also add the Sennheiser E965 to that list. kms microphones neumann pro audio shure frankwboelens. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Quality of diaphragm components Shure KSM9 has a “low mass” “gold plated” “Mylar” diaphragm,. Shure KSM9 Shop now at Amazon. KSM9 microphones offer exceptional consistency across all frequencies, providing more gain before feedback, while decreasing proximity effect. Also no information anywhere on the polar patter options of this replacement cartridge. You could also get the venerated Neumann KMS 105, about $629, I think. Bottom line: I will use both of these microphones (and quite happily) for different occasions, without being too picky about specific applications, simply because they each have their own color. I once worked at a church and the music leader had a certain midrange to his voice. A microphone for live performances needs to have good sound quality, but at the same time it should be able to avoid capturing environmental noise. Shure KSM9. I just picked up a kms 105 and am very impressed with it. Re: OT: Vocal mic Neumann KMS104/105 or Shure KSM9 I replaced all our SM58's with Electro Voice ND767a's They are inexpensive (street price in the $80 range), with better freq response than the 58's and much better feedback rejection. Read also: Shure SM7B Vs Rode Procaster. Slightly more rock n roll..superb feedback rejection too. Handheld microphones come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and price points, but there are a few that rise above the competition. ... Neumann KMS 105. But I agree with you that, for the most part, the sound quality of the leakage is pretty decent for a handheld mic. I also like the AE5400 a lot. Excellent mic. Wow, came back to this thread and I'm surprised at the large amount of constructive feedback. If you mean that one, yeah, I'd like to try that as well. It really is a studio mic for a live setting. I have to agree with Thomas here - small loud stages are best handled with less sensitive dynamics, I think. Re: Shure Beta 87c Vs. KSM9 Keep in mind that 'which mic' is a big mix of personal preference and which fits each voice the best. For comparison, Neumann KMS 105 capitalizes a bit more on the lows, working its proximity with a little more boost and empathy there. As for what you say about them being revealing of vocal ability, I'm not worried about that. I have found the kms 105 to be a fantastic mic for any live usage. I have tested this mic with everything out there but I've spent a lot of time and effort comparing it to the KMS 105 and KSM9 over the last eighteen months and it has consistently come out on top. I'm glad to hear that it is working well for you. Anyone tried both? Shure KSM9 vs Neumann KMS 105 When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Its not every time we get to hear how the story ends. These mics are all similar in quality, the small differences make each the right mic for a particular singer. The Neumann capsule can be ordered on a Sennheiser transmitter for wireless (Sennheiser owns Neumann). I like the response of this mic and it made the night so much more enjoyable. EN PL DE. Guest. Skykrab, May 19, 2011. Today I review the Neumann KMS105, one of the best live stage microphones you can buy. Shure KSM9. I'm working in a big jazz club here in San fran that has a house wired sound system- the speakers are all in the ceiling. Switchable between cardiod and hypercariod. Another which I fell in love with when trying it out in a nearby music store is the EV ND767. Let's get this straight: the Neumann KMS 105 sounds even better! Shure KSM8 vs Shure KSM9. I'd keep it simple and just take your vocal condenser and your DPA.. Way better than any dynamic I've used and good feeback rejection on hypercard. ...is the Audio-Technica AE5400 or the very similar Sennheiser e965 (same features and freq response, except e965 is supercardioid as optional). One of the guys at church uses Neuman KMS-105 at church for lead vox and I was REALLY gassing for this mic before we started using it. Just wondering, have you considered the Shure Beta 87A or Beta 87c? Thanks thumbsup. That being said, super-cardioid mics are very similar to hyper-cardioids other than the fact that there's more front pickup and less rear pickup. So I ended up ordering both the KSM9 and the KMS105, with the intention of returning one. I love the KMS105, but it can be havoc on a small stage with wedges. I worked with a band once whose singer had his own 105. The 105 is a super card, not hyper card, bit of a difference in polar pattern, off axis rejection and off axis coloration. I agree. Hello all, regular lurker on the GS forums here. It sounds great, don't get me wrong but unless you are using in ears and have a controlled stage volume I think the Shure … I sold my KMS 105 to buy the KSM9, and I like the Shure … Either would be more than sufficient to get the job done, though I could see the 105 being used as an instrument mic as well. I agree the 105 isn't very rock and roll. They were a punk band, extremely loud stage volume, playing on a stage about the size of a sofa. I agree the 105 isn't very rock and roll. It is also very nice for recording the acoustic guitar. Thank you all! Shure did not have such a mic then but they do now. The KMS 105 is designed for close micing in nearly all aspects. Works great as a mono drum kit mic for small jazz ensembles as well. It is a very impressive live vocal condenser. Shure KSM8. In my experience, the 105 is a great mic. Ive the Neumann KMS105, and really enjoy it, but Im thinking about trying the KSM9. Your weakest link is your best sound! I have an ae5400, I would try the Audix also, It's the other top contender in this category. An excellent vocal mic that truly gives the Neumann Sound on stage, it excels as a live and studio microphone for speech, acoustic-stringed instruments and brass. Its precision manufactured condenser capsule offers true Neumann sound quality, combined with all the virtues of a rugged stage microphone: excellent pop protection, low handling noise, enormous SPL capability, and high feedback resistance, thanks to its tight supercardioid pattern. Neumann KMS 105 – The Tape Op Review. Reviews . It works famously on snare and I love them on reeds too, especially when the musicians adjust their mic stands for solos and such. I'm assuming here, but I think the OP is playing small places with less than perfect PA systems. Honestly, that makes me want one, but I really need to have a shoot-out between the two of them. In this situation, you're quite lucky in that the 105, 104+ or KSM 9 will all give such a good sound that you can use them in very diverse circumstances and with very diverse styles of music. It's all in the whole chain! Carrying mics is a good thing because you never know what you're going to get, but plugging in a Grace preamp to a pair of SX100's seems a little overkill to me (again, just assuming here). The 104 is cardioid and the 105 is hypercard. EV and Sennheiser both package their mics in the usual zipper bag. It would be right to say that the kms 105 and the Rode s1 can both be terrible on the wrong vocalists and good on the right ones. It has also come to my attention to try the Sennheiser E965. Just wanted to say I, too, perform live gigs as mostly a solo (occasionally duo) acoustic act, and I love the KMS105. I'm testing a KSM9 obtained from ebay- sounds dark and needs tons of gain... maybe 20db more than an akg 535eb - is this what others have experienced? I've been using the ksm9 for a while now. Major upgrade from the Beta 87a I was using before. The Neumann KMS 105 has become an internationally recognized standard in the field of high-quality stage microphones. Any guys out there heard the new Shure KSM9? Sep 26, 2007 #1 I need a vocal microphone for multitrack recordings of liveband's. ... A lot of people seem to like the OMs. However, the KMS 105 is not the best mic for live performance, as it is especially more susceptible to feedback and is poorly suited for a more aggressive environment. Shure KSM9. Shure ships the KSM9 in an aluminum road case. We do everything popular, and not so popular from Beatles to now! When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Reputed to be the best hand-held mic built (per Neumann). I guess I wanted a little more evidence that the ksm9 and the 105 will get the job done from people with experience. The worst thing about it is that it makes me want another Neumann for the studio. I will have to disagree. I'd like to throw that in the mix too. The eq curve looks like the Shure may cut better but has less lows than the Neumann. A loud and small stage is not the right application for this tool. Ancient Skies Sample.mp3 (4.67 MB, 28546 views). I wanted to give him my OM7 but he was convinced (probably just name recognition and pure expense). 1.93 in. I even used it to pick up the ambient sound of an electric bass to mix with the direct signal with great results. An in-depth and practical comparison of the Neumann - KMS 105 vs KMS 104 vs KMS 104 Plus. So the preamp on-stage might be over-complicating things. Its hard to find just to sample or A/B August 2, 2006 @06:33pm. Neumann Sound on Stage. View deals. This particular mic, in my opinion, is truly outstanding on stage. Thin crew... no time or eyes to watch the record levels... so there's another -3dB or so on the entire mix at that point. Shure KSM9HS Dual-Diaphragm Condenser Handheld Vocal… › Questions & Answers It is smooth, while very accurate and clear. I believe you may win the award for the most condensed amount of sense ever packed into one post. Discussion in 'Recording/Live Sound' started by DGTCrazy, May 18, 2011. I would say that these mics are evenly matched in caliber, with a few variations. In their price range I'd much prefer a sennheiser or beyerdynamic dynamic mic. Sure, a nice preamp would be cool to have, but I don't think it's going to be a huge improvement of the sound. I currently own a Shure ULXS4 receiver and a ULX2 wireless transmitter with a Beta 87A cartridge. Also any opinions on comparisons between Beta 87A and KSM9 are welcomed. I have used 58's that have sounded better than Beta 87 with above average PA's. I tried every high end mic out there: KMS105, Audix VX10, Beta 87, Earthworks sr69, e835, sm58 (the KSM9 wasn't out yet), but found the best mic for his voice was an AT AE5400. Neumann ships the KMS 105 in a narrow slightly padded nylon case, similar to a small tool case. Very natural and lush-sounding, even when the singer backs off by a foot. Shure KSM9. Hence, finding a good microphone for such purpose is … But... you can hear how it sits in a live mix. I'm a little late on this thread. The KMS 105 made the night so much easier. If I mess up, shame on me. There is a reason why Dylan and Streisand preferred the AE5400 at the grammys (2011). My search has ended. Its price for a new one here (220 €) is less than a the half of a Neumann KSM 105 (490 €). The Neumann KMS 105 is a condenser microphone typically used in a live setting, but also sounds good in the studio. Excellent with acoustic artists. Shure KSM9. Thanks Matt. Shure KSM9 Vs Neumann KMS 105 Comparison. Available colors: User rating ... suggested Shure SM7B Shure SM58 Shure Beta 58A Shure Beta 87A Neumann KMS 105 Sennheiser e 945 Sennheiser e 965 Shure SM7B Shure SM58 Shure … I'd never been a big fan of AT mics in general but this was the answer for his voice. I agree: keep the preamps at the console end. Someone says S1 has less feedback problems. I like it heh. Shure KSM8 Shop now at Amazon. Shure KSM-9 or Neumann KMS 105? Comparing the two products above (Rode s1 and Neumann kms 105, respectively), it is clearly evident that the microphones have been made to perform their specific purpose, however much they might look alike. Do any of you guys have experience with the Shure RPW184 replacement cartridge for the KSM9. Now on SALE. The sound I heard was symbols and guitar, there might have been some vocals in there somewhere. However, I kept them both. Rode S1 vs. Neumann KMS 105 Showing 1-33 of 33 messages. I was wondering if y'all would help me out with a bit of knowledge. Well, it ain't a studio sample... but here's our worship leader on a KMS105 in a board mix recorded at a Sunday service in November. I have used all the E9xx capsules, and most of the Shure SM and Beta capsules. But for acoustic and some R&B-type acts, it works very well (for me). It's not necessarily as bright as the KSM9, but you won't spend a small fortune and it's an absolutely fantastic sounding microphone. It's a fantastic microphone. I've never AB'ed the 104/105 but I would think they would sound the same if you're on axis. Shure KSM9. Frequency response seems to be very similar. But why limit it to those two?